Now when I say ‘technology’ what I really mean is supplement science. We all know that the weight loss industry is over flooded with commercial products, many of which do absolutely nothing.
In this article I’m going to take the time to review a certain style of up and coming weight loss supplements that have quite incredibly proven to work in scientific case studies. As you will find out in this article, I believe this particular approach is going to become the new future of weight loss as we steer away from the more traditional techniques, mainly fat burning.
Fat Absorbing
Now what do I mean when I say fat absorbing? Well, this new technology works by essentially soaking up fat particles into larger hubs as they enter the body during mealtime. These hubs are then too large for the body to store as fat reserves and as a result they are removed from the body via the digestive tract.
Now not all fat absorbers are made the same and many haven’t be studied properly to determine their level of success, however there is one that has been studied in depth and that is Proactol.
After a major study was completed, participants saw an average of 28% of fat content taking in during mealtime, absorbed into these waste hub sand eventually removed from the body.
That meant that 28% of fat taken in by the average participant which would normally have been stored by the body, was instead removed.
If you think about it, this is quite incredible and is the main reason why fat absorbers are starting to get some attention. Unlike the more traditional approach to burn fat cells directly by increasing your bodies heart rate and metabolism, which of course can become dangerous for those with poor blood pressure, if you buy Proactol and take the supplement daily as suggested, this approach can offer the same incentive without causing any harm to your body.
So coming back to the original question of whether or not fat absorbers are the future of weight loss technology. Well, just ask yourself, which one of those 2 techniques sounds better?
I’ll let you answer that. 😉
